NUS beats Princeton, Cornell in social sciences ranking [the ever-annoying Straits Times Interactive: free registration required, gone after three days]
Summary: NUS 10th in social sciences ranking while Princeton 11th, Cornell 13th, Columbia 14th (Wonder who’s 12th?). NUS 17th in arts and humanities ranking while School of Oriental and African Studies in London (?!) 18th, UPenn 19th. Reiterates previous rankings (18th overall, 9th in engineering). Passing mention of NTU. Shih Choon Fong expresses his joy. Ra ra ra.
Great, once again with the chest-beating over the Times Higher Education Supplement’s rankings. It’s absolutely great recognition for some undoubtedly hardworking academia and university staff at NUS, but why does it have to be reported like the rankings are a bloody horse race? Somehow, our reporters feel the need to emphasise that NUS beat Princeton and Cornell — doesn’t being 10th say enough? Why do our news writers feel they have to help us fellow Singaporeans feel good about ourselves by pointing out some random Ivy League school that didn’t rank as highly as our national university? Flashback: “NUS beats Harvard in engineering”, December 2004; note also how they go out of their way to find the next highest ranked Ivy League school for the arts and humanities ranking.
I feel like I’m listening to a typically Singaporean parent ramble on about how his child has done so well in school, better than this kid who excels in sports, and that other kid who did really well for his PSLE but now not doing so well lah, eh, my boy 10th in the level leh! Not bad hor?
I’m sure we’ll be constantly reminded about these rankings in future ST articles on higher education, so I shan’t belabour my point any further. Well, not until the next THES ranking comes out and the ST proudly declares that NUS is ahead of the India Institute of Technology in basket-weaving.
With my apparent low tolerance for this kind of thing, I’m probably going to implode when I start teaching. Can you tell?
Oh, and happy lunar new year.